Did I Mention Flame Slash = Awesome?

One of my favorite new Rise of the Eldrazi cards is Flame Slash. Here’s why…

Flame Slash
Flame Slash

I don’t think Flame Slash has gotten nearly the respect it deserves.

Is it Lightning Bolt? No.

Is it as good a card as Lightning Bolt? Not really.

Flame Slash is a sorcery rather than an instant. That means you can play it about half as often as Lightning Bolt (even less often if you think about it… You can play Lightning Bolt on your own upkeep, end step, and so forth); Lightning Bolt — long the benchmark for riotous Red — is so much more versatile. It can go to the head (Flame Slash can’t), it can mess up a double block, it can take out a Raging Ravine.

Flame Slash can’t do any of that.

Lightning Bolt is way overpowered. We all know that. Those of you who have been following this blog for a year or more — or me on Twitter or whatever — know that I was skeptical about Lightning bolt really coming back. It is just so overpowered… That, and we were perfectly willing to play Volcanic Hammer in Extended or in Standard Black-based control decks or in ‘Vore or a dozen other places it seemed like a dream world for Lightning Bolt to come back.

Lightning Bolt was the Old Soldier. It wasn’t needed (or at least it didn’t seem needed).

The thing is… Flame Slash is way overpowered, too.

One of the only things that has kept Red removal interesting since, I dunno, Alpha is the fact that it has a high water mark of three; great when a Grixis deck needs to take out a Great Sable Stag… less so when the classic Sligh has to do battle with a Serra Angel.

Modern Standard has its Serra Angel, too; this girl:

Malakir Bloodwitch
Malakir Bloodwitch

You’ll probably recall that Naya Lightsaber sided a pair of Burst Lightnings. They were there, primarily, for a base-White deck to deal with Malakir Bloodwitch (I had Andre siding Burst Lightning in against Boros Bushwhacker, too, but when they were on the mid-range strat going second, Burst Lightning was a lot less effective).

So how about Flame Slash?

Even worse against Boros Bushwhacker.

But how about Malakir Bloodwitch defense?

Couldn’t be better.

I think that you will find Flame Slash to be one of the best cards in the new set. It is probably not going to be a main deck card. Ironically — in a world with options like Searing Blaze — it might not even get Red Deck sideboard love. But for White or Naya decks (at least those unwilling to invest in a Day of Judgment), I think Flame Slash will become the option of choice for suppressing Malakir Bloodwitch and Woolly Thoctar… Or just another one mana play that can help out against, say, a Noble Hierarch on the first turn.

I don’t think it matters a whole lot that Flame Slash is a sorcery. Yes, it is much worse against a man land, but for the most part, creatures give you a window to deal with them before they start whaling away at your life total (no offense to Vengevine). As such, while Flame Slash is less flexible than the current options… Who cares? You don’t make friends with salad, and you don’t win Pro Tours with flexibility (well, maybe sometimes you do… But forget any times that would conflict with my awesomely pithy claim).

In sum: Flame Slash – awesome.

Go fight win!

LOVE
MIKE

facebook comments:

11 comments ↓

#1 Twinblaze on 04.22.10 at 10:51 pm

Flame Slash may also be sideboarded against Jund as a way to kill Putrid Leech easily. The leech can be a real problem for slower decks, and this works beautifully.

#2 Diego on 04.22.10 at 10:59 pm

Great post. I’ve always thought that if I was going to build anything beatdown with red on it (except Jund) I was going to put this card to work. In mono red you need it maindeck (wall of omens, leech…and that’s just enough to play it) and in a naya beatdown deck you need it in sideboard vs malakir bloodwhich, but maybe burst lightning fills that role better, who knows. For now, I’m either playing wall of omens, leech or flame slash in ROE T2. (unless you consider polymorph is a deck).

#3 MTGBattlefield on 04.22.10 at 11:01 pm

Did I Mention Flame Slash = Awesome?…

Your story has been summoned to the battlefield – Trackback from MTGBattlefield…

#4 Diego on 04.22.10 at 11:01 pm

Forgot to mention… you could compare it to electrostatic bolt… boy.. that card was in every red deck.

Sorry for double post.

#5 Russell Tassicker on 04.23.10 at 12:00 am

Seems better than Burst Lightning quite a lot of the time, except when you topdeck it with them on 4 with a fresh Baneslayer Angel on the table. Casting it on Wall of Omens is pretty miserable too. Worth trying, at least!

#6 Alfrebaut on 04.23.10 at 12:30 am

It kills Wall of Omens, as well as other problematic dudes like Rhox Warmonk and Vampire Nighthawk. It’s not lacking in awesome, I can say that right now.

#7 Dold on 04.23.10 at 5:47 am

I don’t see the problem with killing a Wall of Omens. Sure beats attacking into it and bolting it.
I might try and do a split of Flame Slash and Burst Lightning in a sideboard, so I have a better chance of not whiffing on BBE on an empty board.

#8 Vigil on 04.23.10 at 12:43 pm

It kills Putrid Leech and Wall of Omens dead. 5-star spell that I will play 4-of maindeck in every Red deck I play for that reason alone.

#9 Lemt on 04.23.10 at 1:09 pm

I agree it’s very good. There’s another pretty decent common in RoE that makes Flame Slash worth it: Ondu Giant. That guy is everything Rhox Meditant ever wanted to be, and then some. I’m trying him out in a RW deck (you know, Stoneforge+Collar and stuff), and he’s always played great.

#10 Five With Flores » “Awesome” Also Includes Forked Bolt on 04.25.10 at 8:56 pm

[…] I just wanted to should out to our great FiveWithFlores.com community for some of their additional Flame Slash […]

#11 marsupial311 on 05.03.10 at 3:43 am

Love this card. Deals with an early Knight of the Reliquary pretty well and the aforementioned Putrid Leech for a mere 1 mana.

You must log in to post a comment.