<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Phylactery Lich Flagship?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivewithflores.com/2010/07/is-phylactery-lich-flagship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2010/07/is-phylactery-lich-flagship/</link>
	<description>Where you learn to love what Mike Flores loves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KramlmarK</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2010/07/is-phylactery-lich-flagship/#comment-2561</link>
		<dc:creator>KramlmarK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=979#comment-2561</guid>
		<description>As others have pointed out, it&#039;s basically impossible to evaluate this card without knowing what&#039;s in scars. It almost certainly is unplayable in the current standard, but Scars is (most likely) a freaking ARTIFACT BLOCK. That has to be worth something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As others have pointed out, it&#8217;s basically impossible to evaluate this card without knowing what&#8217;s in scars. It almost certainly is unplayable in the current standard, but Scars is (most likely) a freaking ARTIFACT BLOCK. That has to be worth something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProdigalT</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2010/07/is-phylactery-lich-flagship/#comment-2559</link>
		<dc:creator>ProdigalT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 22:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=979#comment-2559</guid>
		<description>Sadly, this does not play very well with Stoneforge Mystic. Probably starts high in price, drops a little, then goes back up with Scars, which will surely bring some artifact goodness. Kinda funny that this bites it to Vampire Hexmage, which is just getting more and more playable with all the Planewalkers about, but mono-black is looking like a serious deck again with Corrupt and &lt;i&gt;Nantuko freaking Shade&lt;/i&gt; back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, this does not play very well with Stoneforge Mystic. Probably starts high in price, drops a little, then goes back up with Scars, which will surely bring some artifact goodness. Kinda funny that this bites it to Vampire Hexmage, which is just getting more and more playable with all the Planewalkers about, but mono-black is looking like a serious deck again with Corrupt and <i>Nantuko freaking Shade</i> back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfrebaut</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2010/07/is-phylactery-lich-flagship/#comment-2557</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfrebaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=979#comment-2557</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s obviously &lt;I&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; kind of flagship. The only thing in question is the sturdiness of it. Anyway, Scars will probably have some friends for him to play with. I say &quot;buy&quot; on him. Also, isn&#039;t it some kind of coincidence that Shade and Key were confirmed? They just happened to be two cards you talked about on the T8M podcast. Weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s obviously <i>some</i> kind of flagship. The only thing in question is the sturdiness of it. Anyway, Scars will probably have some friends for him to play with. I say &#8220;buy&#8221; on him. Also, isn&#8217;t it some kind of coincidence that Shade and Key were confirmed? They just happened to be two cards you talked about on the T8M podcast. Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gifts Ungiven</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2010/07/is-phylactery-lich-flagship/#comment-2556</link>
		<dc:creator>Gifts Ungiven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=979#comment-2556</guid>
		<description>One of the limiters on the Lich&#039;s awesomeness, at least for now, is the fact that Jund decks tend to run Maelstrom Pulse and W/x decks tend to run O-Ring, so there are a lot of generic solutions to stuff out there that can take down the phylacterized item.

I mean, it&#039;s also BBB, which is pretty ugly, but would be totally worthwhile if people had to side in very narrow artifact hate just to deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the limiters on the Lich&#8217;s awesomeness, at least for now, is the fact that Jund decks tend to run Maelstrom Pulse and W/x decks tend to run O-Ring, so there are a lot of generic solutions to stuff out there that can take down the phylacterized item.</p>
<p>I mean, it&#8217;s also BBB, which is pretty ugly, but would be totally worthwhile if people had to side in very narrow artifact hate just to deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guiltfeeder</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2010/07/is-phylactery-lich-flagship/#comment-2555</link>
		<dc:creator>guiltfeeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 06:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=979#comment-2555</guid>
		<description>Mike, interesting article as always.. Do you have a setting that prevents random people from messaging you on MTGO. I can never get you to respond and would love to play some games or chat sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, interesting article as always.. Do you have a setting that prevents random people from messaging you on MTGO. I can never get you to respond and would love to play some games or chat sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dyee418</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2010/07/is-phylactery-lich-flagship/#comment-2553</link>
		<dc:creator>dyee418</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 03:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=979#comment-2553</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s a new rating, &quot;flavor flagship&quot; and doesn&#039;t really need to be anything but that, I mean it obviously is flavorful as hell, it&#039;s actually pretty good despite having to &quot;build around it&quot; and it&#039;s REALLY REALLY flavorful (yes it&#039;s so flavorful I have to mention it twice), or it&#039;s in constructed purgatory where it might get better after Scars of Mirrodin but for now is only good? Also I think it&#039;s funny that half of those artifacts are leaving as soon as it&#039;s October but hey that&#039;s just me being a tiny bit cynical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s a new rating, &#8220;flavor flagship&#8221; and doesn&#8217;t really need to be anything but that, I mean it obviously is flavorful as hell, it&#8217;s actually pretty good despite having to &#8220;build around it&#8221; and it&#8217;s REALLY REALLY flavorful (yes it&#8217;s so flavorful I have to mention it twice), or it&#8217;s in constructed purgatory where it might get better after Scars of Mirrodin but for now is only good? Also I think it&#8217;s funny that half of those artifacts are leaving as soon as it&#8217;s October but hey that&#8217;s just me being a tiny bit cynical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
