<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Probable Act of Treason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivewithflores.com/2009/11/probable-act-of-treason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/11/probable-act-of-treason/</link>
	<description>Where you learn to love what Mike Flores loves</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AutoSponge</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/11/probable-act-of-treason/#comment-1504</link>
		<dc:creator>AutoSponge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=878#comment-1504</guid>
		<description>I was inspired by this deck.  

I won a small, 5-round swiss last night going 4-1 (loss to polymorph Iona when I mana screwed) with a version I'm calling "Nearly Naya."  

Nearly Naya sports a singleton Forest (add) and 4 Rootbound Crags instead of the Scalding Tarns.  That allows me to run 3 Harrow and 4 Bloodbraids main.  I admit the mana base is suspect in mid-range games against "Spread 'em" or MXL, but the trade off for 'Braids helped more than once by cascading into Hell's Thunder (7 for 2 turns) or Harrow (Zektar online) cast Hellspark (13 then 6).

I'd love to hear your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was inspired by this deck.  </p>
<p>I won a small, 5-round swiss last night going 4-1 (loss to polymorph Iona when I mana screwed) with a version I&#8217;m calling &#8220;Nearly Naya.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Nearly Naya sports a singleton Forest (add) and 4 Rootbound Crags instead of the Scalding Tarns.  That allows me to run 3 Harrow and 4 Bloodbraids main.  I admit the mana base is suspect in mid-range games against &#8220;Spread &#8216;em&#8221; or MXL, but the trade off for &#8216;Braids helped more than once by cascading into Hell&#8217;s Thunder (7 for 2 turns) or Harrow (Zektar online) cast Hellspark (13 then 6).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: worm333</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/11/probable-act-of-treason/#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>worm333</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=878#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>I love everything about this deck. I am going to play it at NY States. Balls to the Wall Aggro with a smattering of mana denial seems very good right now with slow clunky cipt mana bases abounding.

Since I never actually test, how would you board against the Naya deck since I assume it will be popular? I am guessing like -4 Goblin Guide, -3 Hell Spark +4 Path +2 Earthquake +1 Act of Treason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love everything about this deck. I am going to play it at NY States. Balls to the Wall Aggro with a smattering of mana denial seems very good right now with slow clunky cipt mana bases abounding.</p>
<p>Since I never actually test, how would you board against the Naya deck since I assume it will be popular? I am guessing like -4 Goblin Guide, -3 Hell Spark +4 Path +2 Earthquake +1 Act of Treason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/11/probable-act-of-treason/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=878#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>Congrats on the Naya Lightsaber win. Awesome. The deck looks good but how does it do against bushwacker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on the Naya Lightsaber win. Awesome. The deck looks good but how does it do against bushwacker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JedDavies</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/11/probable-act-of-treason/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>JedDavies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=878#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>No, it is not, if the Act of Treason is not lethal...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it is not, if the Act of Treason is not lethal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thepedestrian</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/11/probable-act-of-treason/#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>thepedestrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=878#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>Again.

Isnt Mark of Mutiny strictly better then Act of Treason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again.</p>
<p>Isnt Mark of Mutiny strictly better then Act of Treason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTGBattlefield</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/11/probable-act-of-treason/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>MTGBattlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=878#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Probable Act of Treason...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your story has been summoned to the battlefield - Trackback from MTGBattlefield...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Probable Act of Treason&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your story has been summoned to the battlefield - Trackback from MTGBattlefield&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vier1982</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/11/probable-act-of-treason/#comment-1492</link>
		<dc:creator>vier1982</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=878#comment-1492</guid>
		<description>Nice deck. Three is tres and third, tercero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice deck. Three is tres and third, tercero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/11/probable-act-of-treason/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=878#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>In the testing I've done with this deck (I made the changes you mention in the podcasts), I can never seem to get past a good Boros Bushwhacker draw.  The full Boros deck seems more consistent in dealing massive damage with its turns.  Maybe give some of those lists a try?  You can def work in Earthquake and Act of Treason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the testing I&#8217;ve done with this deck (I made the changes you mention in the podcasts), I can never seem to get past a good Boros Bushwhacker draw.  The full Boros deck seems more consistent in dealing massive damage with its turns.  Maybe give some of those lists a try?  You can def work in Earthquake and Act of Treason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
