<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Answer Is&#8230; Architects of Will</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/</link>
	<description>Where you learn to love what Mike Flores loves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 04:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc is the man</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>jc is the man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 22:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=804#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>oh and silence in that list. it&#039;d love to cast it too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh and silence in that list. it&#8217;d love to cast it too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc is the man</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>jc is the man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 22:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=804#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>hey just read ur article. just a few comments. hope u respond to them. 
quick note w/ random thoughts, i think u have too many of several 4 of&#039;s-- i&#039;m sure u know this though. i personally much rather have lightning bolt main over redcap. redcap isnt bad but it doesnt have &quot;flash&quot; on it it. this deck will have to worry more about gettin run down early. so mayb infest or terminate or jund or agony warp. i think plume would b sexy in this deck.
 yeah, i like the architects for casual games(mind u i just play mtgo)... i&#039;m not sure why no1 else noted it or cared to it seems... since it has synergy w/ bituminous blast can fix your draw (though w/ all the mulldrifter recursion...) along w/ it gives u something to do early on etc... however i think its a tad bit overpriced(err cost-ed) for its abilities. i do like the fact that the blasts hit cryptics/mannes/soul manip and company oh also another reason to take out redcap :-) 
 i think u need to b a tad more active early on w/ this deck. i agree a siege gang would b cute as a finisher but i think u should consider a singleton or 2 of bog hellkite (im a johnny so i say that not to b a timmy).
all in all the deck isnt bad. seems to me like it wishes it had some faeries in it or was born w/ some white in it for various cards(tidehollow/punish ignorance/zealous/plumeveilhelp/etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey just read ur article. just a few comments. hope u respond to them.<br />
quick note w/ random thoughts, i think u have too many of several 4 of&#8217;s&#8211; i&#8217;m sure u know this though. i personally much rather have lightning bolt main over redcap. redcap isnt bad but it doesnt have &#8220;flash&#8221; on it it. this deck will have to worry more about gettin run down early. so mayb infest or terminate or jund or agony warp. i think plume would b sexy in this deck.<br />
 yeah, i like the architects for casual games(mind u i just play mtgo)&#8230; i&#8217;m not sure why no1 else noted it or cared to it seems&#8230; since it has synergy w/ bituminous blast can fix your draw (though w/ all the mulldrifter recursion&#8230;) along w/ it gives u something to do early on etc&#8230; however i think its a tad bit overpriced(err cost-ed) for its abilities. i do like the fact that the blasts hit cryptics/mannes/soul manip and company oh also another reason to take out redcap <img src='http://fivewithflores.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
 i think u need to b a tad more active early on w/ this deck. i agree a siege gang would b cute as a finisher but i think u should consider a singleton or 2 of bog hellkite (im a johnny so i say that not to b a timmy).<br />
all in all the deck isnt bad. seems to me like it wishes it had some faeries in it or was born w/ some white in it for various cards(tidehollow/punish ignorance/zealous/plumeveilhelp/etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: punkrockchris</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>punkrockchris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=804#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>I like the deck alot, first instincts are to add demigod or broodmate and anathamancer, not sure this deck can beat jund though so I probably won&#039;t be playing it, but I love the idea of Demigod, mannequin control.  I might try something a little more traditional 5 color with demigod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the deck alot, first instincts are to add demigod or broodmate and anathamancer, not sure this deck can beat jund though so I probably won&#8217;t be playing it, but I love the idea of Demigod, mannequin control.  I might try something a little more traditional 5 color with demigod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTGBattlefield</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>MTGBattlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=804#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Answer Is… Architects of Will...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your story has been summoned to the battlefield - Trackback from MTGBattlefield...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Answer Is… Architects of Will&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your story has been summoned to the battlefield &#8211; Trackback from MTGBattlefield&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monk Realist</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>Monk Realist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=804#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>I like this deck a lot, and I&#039;ll probably end up playing it even though it seems likely to be kind of terrible. 

Bit Blast can hit Mannequin, Soul Manip, Cryptic, Architects, or Redcap. Architects are lackluster, and everything else except redcap is kind of conditional. Really don&#039;t think Bit Blast is good here. 

Siege-gang commander is great with mannequin, great with redcap, and is at least a passable solution to Stag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this deck a lot, and I&#8217;ll probably end up playing it even though it seems likely to be kind of terrible. </p>
<p>Bit Blast can hit Mannequin, Soul Manip, Cryptic, Architects, or Redcap. Architects are lackluster, and everything else except redcap is kind of conditional. Really don&#8217;t think Bit Blast is good here. </p>
<p>Siege-gang commander is great with mannequin, great with redcap, and is at least a passable solution to Stag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ascensionblade</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>ascensionblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=804#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>Cruel, Cryptic, Soul Manipulation.
Then, Torrent of Souls gets mentioned above.
Perhaps this could use a Nucklavee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cruel, Cryptic, Soul Manipulation.<br />
Then, Torrent of Souls gets mentioned above.<br />
Perhaps this could use a Nucklavee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tekanan</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>Tekanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=804#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how relevant architects of will is in this deck... hmm must try out!

btw, have you considered torrent of souls? Torrenting a murderous redcap is like a flametongue kavu on steroids.

I also like Sedraxis Specter here. It will be something like a reverse shadowmage infiltrator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how relevant architects of will is in this deck&#8230; hmm must try out!</p>
<p>btw, have you considered torrent of souls? Torrenting a murderous redcap is like a flametongue kavu on steroids.</p>
<p>I also like Sedraxis Specter here. It will be something like a reverse shadowmage infiltrator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aten</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>Aten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=804#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>Is Murderous Redcap good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Murderous Redcap good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshf</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>joshf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=804#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>I like it.  Do you ever decline the option with Soul Manipulation to have a Mannequin target the next turn?  Seems like a little tension there, but probably the good kind of tension.  I&#039;ll be sad when evoke guys rotate.

Yeah, the Blasts ... I hate &quot;ass-cading&quot; into something inappropriate.  Banefire might be better, but how &#039;bout a couple Profane Commands?

The Fleshbags have a bit of synergy with Murderous Redcaps too.  I recently was using a River Kelpie deck with a lot of this same stuff and was always happy to see the Marauders and Redcaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.  Do you ever decline the option with Soul Manipulation to have a Mannequin target the next turn?  Seems like a little tension there, but probably the good kind of tension.  I&#8217;ll be sad when evoke guys rotate.</p>
<p>Yeah, the Blasts &#8230; I hate &#8220;ass-cading&#8221; into something inappropriate.  Banefire might be better, but how &#8217;bout a couple Profane Commands?</p>
<p>The Fleshbags have a bit of synergy with Murderous Redcaps too.  I recently was using a River Kelpie deck with a lot of this same stuff and was always happy to see the Marauders and Redcaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealEvilGenius</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/07/the-answer-is-architects-of-will/#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>RealEvilGenius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=804#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>The deck is interesting. I&#039;m unsure about the architects of will though. Looking for a replacement I came upon Fleshbag Marauder. It&#039;s basically a 3 mana edict, but is reusable with mannequin and actually has a shot at taking out Stags. Caldera Helion and Lightning Bolt are probably better options for Stag deterence so my mind may just be wandering.

As promised in response to your tweet about Broodmate vs Baneslayer Angel in 5CC. I would maindeck Broodmates. They are the harder threat to deal with. 5cc already is favored in an aggro matchup, which is where the angel shines. However I would want some combination of Baneslayer Angels/ Karrthus in my sideboard for the mirror. If you can get the drop on your opponent with them they could easily put you into a winning position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deck is interesting. I&#8217;m unsure about the architects of will though. Looking for a replacement I came upon Fleshbag Marauder. It&#8217;s basically a 3 mana edict, but is reusable with mannequin and actually has a shot at taking out Stags. Caldera Helion and Lightning Bolt are probably better options for Stag deterence so my mind may just be wandering.</p>
<p>As promised in response to your tweet about Broodmate vs Baneslayer Angel in 5CC. I would maindeck Broodmates. They are the harder threat to deal with. 5cc already is favored in an aggro matchup, which is where the angel shines. However I would want some combination of Baneslayer Angels/ Karrthus in my sideboard for the mirror. If you can get the drop on your opponent with them they could easily put you into a winning position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

