<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glacial Fortress &amp; Deck Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivewithflores.com/2009/06/glacial-fortress-deck-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/06/glacial-fortress-deck-design/</link>
	<description>Where you learn to love what Mike Flores loves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 04:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five With Flores &#187; Vampire Nocturnus and / or Drowned Catacomb</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/06/glacial-fortress-deck-design/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Five With Flores &#187; Vampire Nocturnus and / or Drowned Catacomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=742#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>[...] Catacomb, like sister M10 dual land Glacial Fortress seems to be part of a cycle that incentivizes very different multi-land use than some previous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Catacomb, like sister M10 dual land Glacial Fortress seems to be part of a cycle that incentivizes very different multi-land use than some previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/06/glacial-fortress-deck-design/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=742#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>@DeadLions
With a PhD in mathematics, you might as well INVENT Magic :)

@Amarsir
What&#039;s the problem? You would still start with Graven Cairns. Either Mountain or Swamp would work as your first land, or second with Graven Cairns. But yeah, punchline :)

@Jeranimus Rex
I like a U/G, B/W.

@Joe
I was saying M10 will compliment Ravnica, not replace it, in Extended. Onslaught duals are goners automatically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DeadLions<br />
With a PhD in mathematics, you might as well INVENT Magic <img src='http://fivewithflores.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Amarsir<br />
What&#8217;s the problem? You would still start with Graven Cairns. Either Mountain or Swamp would work as your first land, or second with Graven Cairns. But yeah, punchline <img src='http://fivewithflores.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Jeranimus Rex<br />
I like a U/G, B/W.</p>
<p>@Joe<br />
I was saying M10 will compliment Ravnica, not replace it, in Extended. Onslaught duals are goners automatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guiltfeeder</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/06/glacial-fortress-deck-design/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>guiltfeeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=742#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>Hey, Im not sure if you were planning on testing it further but I really enjoy playing the naya based cascade build you worked on a couple posts ago. Do you plan on improving on it or going over it further in the future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Im not sure if you were planning on testing it further but I really enjoy playing the naya based cascade build you worked on a couple posts ago. Do you plan on improving on it or going over it further in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/06/glacial-fortress-deck-design/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=742#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the new M10 lands will replace the Ravnica cycle dual lands in Extended for two reasons: 

1)They don&#039;t have basic land types and are therefore not viable for the Onslaught fetchlands or other search spells (except for mediocre searchers like Sylvan Scrying).

2)The condition for having them come into play untapped is more difficult to satisfy.  You won&#039;t always have a hand that has basics in it.  How unexciting is it to open on a hand of a couple M10 lands and no basics with your Zoo deck?  With the Ravnica lands, you always (almost) have the resource you need for them come into play untapped (life).  I think the greater chance that you can get screwed by top-decking an M10 land instead of a Ravnica dual land will make them much less playable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the new M10 lands will replace the Ravnica cycle dual lands in Extended for two reasons: </p>
<p>1)They don&#8217;t have basic land types and are therefore not viable for the Onslaught fetchlands or other search spells (except for mediocre searchers like Sylvan Scrying).</p>
<p>2)The condition for having them come into play untapped is more difficult to satisfy.  You won&#8217;t always have a hand that has basics in it.  How unexciting is it to open on a hand of a couple M10 lands and no basics with your Zoo deck?  With the Ravnica lands, you always (almost) have the resource you need for them come into play untapped (life).  I think the greater chance that you can get screwed by top-decking an M10 land instead of a Ravnica dual land will make them much less playable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeranimus Rex</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/06/glacial-fortress-deck-design/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeranimus Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=742#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>Well, if there are enemy colored Duals, then it become more possible. I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if there are enemy colored Duals, then it become more possible. I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas D. Wolfwood</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/06/glacial-fortress-deck-design/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas D. Wolfwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=742#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>Lightning Bolt is in the visual spoiler on Wizards...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightning Bolt is in the visual spoiler on Wizards&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amarsir</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/06/glacial-fortress-deck-design/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>Amarsir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=742#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;m reading along about 2-drop Sygg and 3-drop Ram-Gang, and trying to figure out how the new duals help that &lt;i&gt;at all&lt;/i&gt;.  Then the punchline.

Yes these duals do seem ready for another meta in another time.  Whether they will herald that meta or just wait for it, we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m reading along about 2-drop Sygg and 3-drop Ram-Gang, and trying to figure out how the new duals help that <i>at all</i>.  Then the punchline.</p>
<p>Yes these duals do seem ready for another meta in another time.  Whether they will herald that meta or just wait for it, we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeadLions</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/06/glacial-fortress-deck-design/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>DeadLions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=742#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>In the future: constructing a mana base will require a PhD in mathematics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the future: constructing a mana base will require a PhD in mathematics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTG Battlefield</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/06/glacial-fortress-deck-design/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>MTG Battlefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=742#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Five With Flores  » Glacial Fortress &amp; Deck Design...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your story has been summoned to the battlefield - Trackback from MTG Battlefield...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Five With Flores  » Glacial Fortress &amp; Deck Design&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your story has been summoned to the battlefield &#8211; Trackback from MTG Battlefield&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

