<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Part Two, Who Wants a Loxodon Hierarch?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivewithflores.com/2009/05/part-two-who-wants-a-loxodon-hierarch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/05/part-two-who-wants-a-loxodon-hierarch/</link>
	<description>Where you learn to love what Mike Flores loves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five With Flores &#187; Just in Time: Obstinate Baloth</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/05/part-two-who-wants-a-loxodon-hierarch/#comment-2538</link>
		<dc:creator>Five With Flores &#187; Just in Time: Obstinate Baloth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 04:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=608#comment-2538</guid>
		<description>[...] Baloth ∙ Loxodon Hierarch ∙ Ravenous Baloth Wilt-Leaf Liege ∙ Dodecapod ∙ &#8230; and Obstinate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Baloth ∙ Loxodon Hierarch ∙ Ravenous Baloth Wilt-Leaf Liege ∙ Dodecapod ∙ &#8230; and Obstinate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KZipple</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/05/part-two-who-wants-a-loxodon-hierarch/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>KZipple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 20:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=608#comment-723</guid>
		<description>Re: LSV
I mean, it isn&#039;t like the tournament where he put down the 4/4&#039;s was won by some midrange green deck or anything.
Re: What LSV said
I think it is fundamentally erroneous to say that Strategy X is innately better than Strategy Y.  I think the trap that some people (Mike, old school LSV, myself sometimes) is that we get comfortable with midrange decks and so our testing is skewed by that.  If we were better, we would have a more accurate understanding of what the best deck is, whether it has Vendilion Cliques or Loxodon Hierarchs (or Martyr of Sands!).
Re: Cascade Ramp
I think this is what happens when you make Null Rod&#039;s flavor text into a card...except Gerrard is right this time.  But OH MAN is Enlisted Wurm exciting.  It&#039;s always fantastic in Limited...why  not 60 cards?  As per my last comment, I&#039;m definitely bombing out of Regionals this year.  Thanks Mike.  Maybe it needs like 2x Fallout main?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: LSV<br />
I mean, it isn&#8217;t like the tournament where he put down the 4/4&#8242;s was won by some midrange green deck or anything.<br />
Re: What LSV said<br />
I think it is fundamentally erroneous to say that Strategy X is innately better than Strategy Y.  I think the trap that some people (Mike, old school LSV, myself sometimes) is that we get comfortable with midrange decks and so our testing is skewed by that.  If we were better, we would have a more accurate understanding of what the best deck is, whether it has Vendilion Cliques or Loxodon Hierarchs (or Martyr of Sands!).<br />
Re: Cascade Ramp<br />
I think this is what happens when you make Null Rod&#8217;s flavor text into a card&#8230;except Gerrard is right this time.  But OH MAN is Enlisted Wurm exciting.  It&#8217;s always fantastic in Limited&#8230;why  not 60 cards?  As per my last comment, I&#8217;m definitely bombing out of Regionals this year.  Thanks Mike.  Maybe it needs like 2x Fallout main?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
