<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alara Reborn &#8211; Lord of Extinction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivewithflores.com/2009/04/alara-reborn-lord-of-extinction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/04/alara-reborn-lord-of-extinction/</link>
	<description>Where you learn to love what Mike Flores loves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 04:49:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five With Flores &#187; Almost Missed Bonehoard</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/04/alara-reborn-lord-of-extinction/#comment-3710</link>
		<dc:creator>Five With Flores &#187; Almost Missed Bonehoard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=569#comment-3710</guid>
		<description>[...] (you may remember this deck from the pre-Psylum version of The Dojo, or perhaps from my writeup of Lord of Extinction two years ago). I think I testedmore for that Regionals than almost any other tournament I&#8217;ve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (you may remember this deck from the pre-Psylum version of The Dojo, or perhaps from my writeup of Lord of Extinction two years ago). I think I testedmore for that Regionals than almost any other tournament I&#8217;ve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 8 Magic &#187; More Lord of Extinction</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/04/alara-reborn-lord-of-extinction/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 8 Magic &#187; More Lord of Extinction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=569#comment-692</guid>
		<description>[...] you haven&#8217;t already read my first thoughts on Lord of Extinction over at Five With Flores, you might want to check out Alara Reborn - Lord of Extinction before [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you haven&#8217;t already read my first thoughts on Lord of Extinction over at Five With Flores, you might want to check out Alara Reborn &#8211; Lord of Extinction before [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/04/alara-reborn-lord-of-extinction/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=569#comment-691</guid>
		<description>I agree that this guy will probably find a place in BWG standard lists for a little while.  Also, I got my copy of Deckade in the mail today, so I&#039;ll be reading about those tournament reports soon.  I can&#039;t wait!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this guy will probably find a place in BWG standard lists for a little while.  Also, I got my copy of Deckade in the mail today, so I&#8217;ll be reading about those tournament reports soon.  I can&#8217;t wait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KZipple</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/04/alara-reborn-lord-of-extinction/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>KZipple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=569#comment-689</guid>
		<description>I actually think this guy has potential.  Maybe I just love GWB decks with lots of removal too much [anyone else have that vice?], but awesome mana won&#039;t always be free in Standard.  He may get there in the fall, but definitely not a world of Reflecting Pools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think this guy has potential.  Maybe I just love GWB decks with lots of removal too much [anyone else have that vice?], but awesome mana won&#8217;t always be free in Standard.  He may get there in the fall, but definitely not a world of Reflecting Pools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hudnall56</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/04/alara-reborn-lord-of-extinction/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>hudnall56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=569#comment-684</guid>
		<description>Well, it IS good.  However, the five mana mark and lack of evasion prevents it from playing Fledgling Dragon in beatdown decks and co-existing in nearly every format with Broodmate Dragon is going to keep it out of control.  Lord of Extinction is Overbeing of Myth or Rakdos Pit Dragon: it&#039;ll be good, just not good enough.  I bet it&#039;ll probably find it&#039;s way into some successful lists, but it&#039;s surrounded by so many superior creatures that it probably won&#039;t ever be the right one.  Maybe it&#039;ll find it&#039;s place in Build Your Own Block.  If it&#039;s */* = cards in graveyards while it&#039;s in other zones than play (I&#039;m not certain if it would be, but I seem to remember that, at least at one point, that was the ruling on Tarmogoyf) it&#039;ll might be the big dumb creature of choice to remove with a Sutured Ghoul.  If, you know, anyone would actually want to do that anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it IS good.  However, the five mana mark and lack of evasion prevents it from playing Fledgling Dragon in beatdown decks and co-existing in nearly every format with Broodmate Dragon is going to keep it out of control.  Lord of Extinction is Overbeing of Myth or Rakdos Pit Dragon: it&#8217;ll be good, just not good enough.  I bet it&#8217;ll probably find it&#8217;s way into some successful lists, but it&#8217;s surrounded by so many superior creatures that it probably won&#8217;t ever be the right one.  Maybe it&#8217;ll find it&#8217;s place in Build Your Own Block.  If it&#8217;s */* = cards in graveyards while it&#8217;s in other zones than play (I&#8217;m not certain if it would be, but I seem to remember that, at least at one point, that was the ruling on Tarmogoyf) it&#8217;ll might be the big dumb creature of choice to remove with a Sutured Ghoul.  If, you know, anyone would actually want to do that anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gifts Ungiven</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/04/alara-reborn-lord-of-extinction/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Gifts Ungiven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=569#comment-683</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know that Mr. Extinction here is even good, really, so much as simply &quot;big.&quot; I don&#039;t think I&#039;d play it in the place of Colossus (pro-black), Nath (disruptive) or Dragon (two dudes). I mean, it promises to be a single-turn game-ender in the late game for a control deck, but it&#039;s otherwise a really bad topdeck, being just a big guy, and a single one at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that Mr. Extinction here is even good, really, so much as simply &#8220;big.&#8221; I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d play it in the place of Colossus (pro-black), Nath (disruptive) or Dragon (two dudes). I mean, it promises to be a single-turn game-ender in the late game for a control deck, but it&#8217;s otherwise a really bad topdeck, being just a big guy, and a single one at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

