<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Card Advantage Works, Part 1: Bad Decks, Good Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivewithflores.com/2009/03/how-card-advantage-works-part-1-bad-decks-good-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/03/how-card-advantage-works-part-1-bad-decks-good-theory/</link>
	<description>Where you learn to love what Mike Flores loves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 04:49:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lunarodin</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/03/how-card-advantage-works-part-1-bad-decks-good-theory/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>lunarodin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=472#comment-591</guid>
		<description>i wanna see flores resurect the Korlash decks...i think they look decent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wanna see flores resurect the Korlash decks&#8230;i think they look decent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/03/how-card-advantage-works-part-1-bad-decks-good-theory/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=472#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Great article, can&#039;t wait to read the rest, but yeah, wtf is going on with that shot.  I can only guess it&#039;s just because you actually got in there for damage with Viashino Slaughtermaster which should never happen ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, can&#8217;t wait to read the rest, but yeah, wtf is going on with that shot.  I can only guess it&#8217;s just because you actually got in there for damage with Viashino Slaughtermaster which should never happen ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KZipple</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/03/how-card-advantage-works-part-1-bad-decks-good-theory/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>KZipple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=472#comment-589</guid>
		<description>So your Swans(?) opponent six-for-one&#039;d you because your deck isn&#039;t consistent enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So your Swans(?) opponent six-for-one&#8217;d you because your deck isn&#8217;t consistent enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kabux</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/03/how-card-advantage-works-part-1-bad-decks-good-theory/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>kabux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=472#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Looks to me that he&#039;s protecting himself quite nicely until he combos off with his swan. Since his deck is probably running 8-9 islands and red removal his blood moon effectively shuts down the domain deck, at least long enough to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks to me that he&#8217;s protecting himself quite nicely until he combos off with his swan. Since his deck is probably running 8-9 islands and red removal his blood moon effectively shuts down the domain deck, at least long enough to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrongwaygoback</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/03/how-card-advantage-works-part-1-bad-decks-good-theory/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>wrongwaygoback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 02:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=472#comment-587</guid>
		<description>I was suffering so much cognitive dissonance from that screenshot I couldn&#039;t even tell why for about ten minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was suffering so much cognitive dissonance from that screenshot I couldn&#8217;t even tell why for about ten minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StaplerGuy</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/03/how-card-advantage-works-part-1-bad-decks-good-theory/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>StaplerGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=472#comment-585</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s clearly a particularly bad hand of Swans.

The Moons are standard-ish, the Pool is for Grudge or possibly Explosives for three, and the Reef is burgled tech from TEPS.

Or something? Could be TEPS burgling the Moon but then you have to explain the Pool AND the Guide as opposed to just the Reef.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s clearly a particularly bad hand of Swans.</p>
<p>The Moons are standard-ish, the Pool is for Grudge or possibly Explosives for three, and the Reef is burgled tech from TEPS.</p>
<p>Or something? Could be TEPS burgling the Moon but then you have to explain the Pool AND the Guide as opposed to just the Reef.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GRat</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/03/how-card-advantage-works-part-1-bad-decks-good-theory/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>GRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=472#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Haha, what the hell @ the screenshot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, what the hell @ the screenshot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeilend</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/03/how-card-advantage-works-part-1-bad-decks-good-theory/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>zeilend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=472#comment-583</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure that you&#039;re being a bit too cute with the first BW deck you posted considering that you&#039;re spending five slots on an eight-mana combo that has worked out for you exactly once. I know you love your big mana decks, but that seems outright ridiculous to me. Also, 4x Martyr of Sands in a non-Martyr deck that runs Ranger of Eos seems overkill. That said, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s that much you can do with this particular color combination in general....although I think Will has found a list that makes him happy, if it means anything.

Also, you said that you prefer Viashino Slaughtermaster over Boros Swiftblade...do you think that the extra point of toughness could have some relevance against opposing Mogg Fanatics, etc? Any opinions on Path to Exile in this sort of deck? Seems fine to me, especially since blockers can be a problem for getting the GMGT &#039;combo&#039; to go off.

4 Boros Swiftblade
4 Mogg Fanatic
4 Wild Nacatl
4 Kird Ape
4 Wooly Thoctar
4 Tarmogoyf

4 Tribal Flames
4 Might of Alara
3 Path to Exile
4 Lightning Helix
1 Brute Force
+ Land (inc. U and B duals)

Only real difference is no Confidant and PtE to get rid of blockers..but card drawing is probably better..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that you&#8217;re being a bit too cute with the first BW deck you posted considering that you&#8217;re spending five slots on an eight-mana combo that has worked out for you exactly once. I know you love your big mana decks, but that seems outright ridiculous to me. Also, 4x Martyr of Sands in a non-Martyr deck that runs Ranger of Eos seems overkill. That said, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s that much you can do with this particular color combination in general&#8230;.although I think Will has found a list that makes him happy, if it means anything.</p>
<p>Also, you said that you prefer Viashino Slaughtermaster over Boros Swiftblade&#8230;do you think that the extra point of toughness could have some relevance against opposing Mogg Fanatics, etc? Any opinions on Path to Exile in this sort of deck? Seems fine to me, especially since blockers can be a problem for getting the GMGT &#8216;combo&#8217; to go off.</p>
<p>4 Boros Swiftblade<br />
4 Mogg Fanatic<br />
4 Wild Nacatl<br />
4 Kird Ape<br />
4 Wooly Thoctar<br />
4 Tarmogoyf</p>
<p>4 Tribal Flames<br />
4 Might of Alara<br />
3 Path to Exile<br />
4 Lightning Helix<br />
1 Brute Force<br />
+ Land (inc. U and B duals)</p>
<p>Only real difference is no Confidant and PtE to get rid of blockers..but card drawing is probably better..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starwarer</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/03/how-card-advantage-works-part-1-bad-decks-good-theory/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>starwarer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=472#comment-582</guid>
		<description>What do I think about that screenshot?  WTF?!

All I know is, you have a dude on the board and I have no clue, whatsoever, about what the opposing deck wants to do.  I mean, Dreadship Reef, Breeding Pool, Blood Moon and Simian Spirit Guide occupying the same 75?  I suppose it COULD be a good idea, but I don&#039;t see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do I think about that screenshot?  WTF?!</p>
<p>All I know is, you have a dude on the board and I have no clue, whatsoever, about what the opposing deck wants to do.  I mean, Dreadship Reef, Breeding Pool, Blood Moon and Simian Spirit Guide occupying the same 75?  I suppose it COULD be a good idea, but I don&#8217;t see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

