<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Extended SWOT: The Lightning Bolt Deck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/extended-swot-the-lightning-bolt-deck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/extended-swot-the-lightning-bolt-deck/</link>
	<description>Where you learn to love what Mike Flores loves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 04:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aten</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/extended-swot-the-lightning-bolt-deck/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Aten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=289#comment-288</guid>
		<description>22 land for PTQ build?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22 land for PTQ build?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfoxrun</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/extended-swot-the-lightning-bolt-deck/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>cfoxrun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=289#comment-287</guid>
		<description>I would like to see the Fairies matchup.   Both Mono-Blue and U/B.      I would think Red has good game as it can wait till EOT to play its spells negating some of Blues advantage.     I know John did well with it.    Was wondering what he lost to or what the worse matchups were (Tier 1 decks).          Zoo with Finks out of the sideboard can be a bit more problematic,  but they do have to draw them and hopefully you have the Vortex in play

Sideboard strategies?     I am guessing Pillars came in for ??? Spark Elementals  ???.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see the Fairies matchup.   Both Mono-Blue and U/B.      I would think Red has good game as it can wait till EOT to play its spells negating some of Blues advantage.     I know John did well with it.    Was wondering what he lost to or what the worse matchups were (Tier 1 decks).          Zoo with Finks out of the sideboard can be a bit more problematic,  but they do have to draw them and hopefully you have the Vortex in play</p>
<p>Sideboard strategies?     I am guessing Pillars came in for ??? Spark Elementals  ???.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sleeping_Insomniac</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/extended-swot-the-lightning-bolt-deck/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Sleeping_Insomniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=289#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Flores, I was just reading the list and I think I might have double, triple, and even quadruple checked the list and I still seem to be missing 4 cards on the MD. Might want to correct that. ^_^;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flores, I was just reading the list and I think I might have double, triple, and even quadruple checked the list and I still seem to be missing 4 cards on the MD. Might want to correct that. ^_^;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gifts Ungiven</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/extended-swot-the-lightning-bolt-deck/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Gifts Ungiven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=289#comment-284</guid>
		<description>On Jitte as a threat to this deck, I think Jitte is bad no matter what as long as your opponent can play and equip creatures. Each burn spell that takes down a creature is basically a win for almost any deck you&#039;re playing against -- basically, anything that gains life or virtually gains life (by deflecting burn) pushes the game into the later-game, when the red deck is hoping to keep topdecking worthwhile threats, but the opponent is likely to have some kind of card advantage online.

From observing matches online, it seems like Sulfuric Vortex is critical for beating long-game decks, since, for a burn deck, it&#039;s virtual card advantage (like Jitte counters).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Jitte as a threat to this deck, I think Jitte is bad no matter what as long as your opponent can play and equip creatures. Each burn spell that takes down a creature is basically a win for almost any deck you&#8217;re playing against &#8212; basically, anything that gains life or virtually gains life (by deflecting burn) pushes the game into the later-game, when the red deck is hoping to keep topdecking worthwhile threats, but the opponent is likely to have some kind of card advantage online.</p>
<p>From observing matches online, it seems like Sulfuric Vortex is critical for beating long-game decks, since, for a burn deck, it&#8217;s virtual card advantage (like Jitte counters).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingpete</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/extended-swot-the-lightning-bolt-deck/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>kingpete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=289#comment-283</guid>
		<description>I didnt mean to sound big headed there or anything, im just putting out there that i have done a lot of research and testing in this format, which i like to think adds an air of credibility to my posts. Please feel free to correct me at any time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt mean to sound big headed there or anything, im just putting out there that i have done a lot of research and testing in this format, which i like to think adds an air of credibility to my posts. Please feel free to correct me at any time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingpete</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/extended-swot-the-lightning-bolt-deck/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>kingpete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=289#comment-282</guid>
		<description>I have the feeling this will be the most popular deck at PTQs due mainly to the fact that its the cheapest by far to build up, and relatively easy to learn how to play, ie burn your opponents face until they die. However, ive seen this deck losing to mono blue fae quite a bit, it just runs out of gas and MBF gets spellstutter + riptide lab going and then goes on to win easily. It doesnt surprise me that this red deck owns zoo however, which i think will serve to keep it in check at PTQs. This season is shaping up to be quite fun! Also, im Peter Crim who top 8d the Memphis Worlds PTQ with Bubble Hulk. Go Cavs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the feeling this will be the most popular deck at PTQs due mainly to the fact that its the cheapest by far to build up, and relatively easy to learn how to play, ie burn your opponents face until they die. However, ive seen this deck losing to mono blue fae quite a bit, it just runs out of gas and MBF gets spellstutter + riptide lab going and then goes on to win easily. It doesnt surprise me that this red deck owns zoo however, which i think will serve to keep it in check at PTQs. This season is shaping up to be quite fun! Also, im Peter Crim who top 8d the Memphis Worlds PTQ with Bubble Hulk. Go Cavs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

