<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conflux &#8211; Knight of the Reliquary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/</link>
	<description>Where you learn to love what Mike Flores loves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 04:49:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five With Flores &#187; Sovereigns of Lost Alara Update</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/#comment-2981</link>
		<dc:creator>Five With Flores &#187; Sovereigns of Lost Alara Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=385#comment-2981</guid>
		<description>[...] Knight of the Reliquary 4 Sovereigns of Lost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Knight of the Reliquary 4 Sovereigns of Lost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five With Flores &#187; Update: Celestial Purge!</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Five With Flores &#187; Update: Celestial Purge!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=385#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>[...] Knight of the Reliquary 4 Maelstrom Pulse 4 Putrid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Knight of the Reliquary 4 Maelstrom Pulse 4 Putrid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 8 Magic &#187; Zendikar Official Preview - Baloth Woodcrasher</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 8 Magic &#187; Zendikar Official Preview - Baloth Woodcrasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=385#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>[...] if you have a way to cheat Landfall, such as a Knight of the Reliquary in play, then you have a way to help protect Baloth Woodcrasher on his virginal turn. Knight of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if you have a way to cheat Landfall, such as a Knight of the Reliquary in play, then you have a way to help protect Baloth Woodcrasher on his virginal turn. Knight of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=385#comment-454</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get the hype. I think this is one of those cards that is just under the playable line in constructed. It does a lot of cute things, but it is still 3cc and takes many turns to actually get going much of the time. I guess he might be good in extended or maybe even legacy with all the sacklands, but it seems like there are more consistent fatties to turn to. also most aggro decks really don&#039;t want to spend 3 mana on anything nowadays. At least he makes an extra mana every time you use his ability. 

This set is just Banefire and a bunch of other cards that are barely worth looking at. (Ok Path of Exile is also the nuts) I see people getting way too excited about uncounterable pyroclasm, 6cc do nothings and 1/2 elves that are supposed to counteract bitterblossom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the hype. I think this is one of those cards that is just under the playable line in constructed. It does a lot of cute things, but it is still 3cc and takes many turns to actually get going much of the time. I guess he might be good in extended or maybe even legacy with all the sacklands, but it seems like there are more consistent fatties to turn to. also most aggro decks really don&#8217;t want to spend 3 mana on anything nowadays. At least he makes an extra mana every time you use his ability. </p>
<p>This set is just Banefire and a bunch of other cards that are barely worth looking at. (Ok Path of Exile is also the nuts) I see people getting way too excited about uncounterable pyroclasm, 6cc do nothings and 1/2 elves that are supposed to counteract bitterblossom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KZipple</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>KZipple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=385#comment-426</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t call it a flagship because while it does cool things, they aren&#039;t really the kind of things worth building your deck around, at least not in this format.  If you could, I don&#039;t know, untap it for G...we&#039;re talking flagship.  But is it really going to inspire new decks to be built?  Especially in Standard?  Maybe this is an Akira Asahara Flagship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t call it a flagship because while it does cool things, they aren&#8217;t really the kind of things worth building your deck around, at least not in this format.  If you could, I don&#8217;t know, untap it for G&#8230;we&#8217;re talking flagship.  But is it really going to inspire new decks to be built?  Especially in Standard?  Maybe this is an Akira Asahara Flagship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burn1nMyLight</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Burn1nMyLight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=385#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Why is this not Flagship, even if its a bit leaky? It&#039;s begging to be built around, and there is tons of synergy waiting to be tapped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this not Flagship, even if its a bit leaky? It&#8217;s begging to be built around, and there is tons of synergy waiting to be tapped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GavinV</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>GavinV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=385#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Rerepete, unfortunately Flagstones is not a plains. You can&#039;t sacrifice it to the Knight. Too bad, because that&#039;d be pretty nifty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rerepete, unfortunately Flagstones is not a plains. You can&#8217;t sacrifice it to the Knight. Too bad, because that&#8217;d be pretty nifty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rerepete</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Rerepete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=385#comment-421</guid>
		<description>The interaction with Flagstones is amazing....tap the land, sac. it to KoR, fetch another Flagstones, (and get a bonus plains)...You net out with WW in your pool, KoR is +1/+1 and you have more fodder for the next turn (unless you enchant with Freed from the Real but that is a different story...)

Chances are that you already have one or more lands in graveyard before KoR hits the board anyhow (Terramorphic Expanse, fetch land) which would probably put it out of burn&#039;s 3 point range.

I was thinking that it will fit in Zoo deck, or UWG control deck as a great land tutor giving both board position (defensive mostly).  Just think what a mid-game Armageddon would do for her (It looks to me like it is an image of Elspeth, herself, in the artwork).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interaction with Flagstones is amazing&#8230;.tap the land, sac. it to KoR, fetch another Flagstones, (and get a bonus plains)&#8230;You net out with WW in your pool, KoR is +1/+1 and you have more fodder for the next turn (unless you enchant with Freed from the Real but that is a different story&#8230;)</p>
<p>Chances are that you already have one or more lands in graveyard before KoR hits the board anyhow (Terramorphic Expanse, fetch land) which would probably put it out of burn&#8217;s 3 point range.</p>
<p>I was thinking that it will fit in Zoo deck, or UWG control deck as a great land tutor giving both board position (defensive mostly).  Just think what a mid-game Armageddon would do for her (It looks to me like it is an image of Elspeth, herself, in the artwork).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrongwaygoback</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>wrongwaygoback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=385#comment-416</guid>
		<description>Between Ancient Ziggurat &amp; Reflecting Pool, it&#039;s time to come out with the 5CCC Deck - Five Colour Creature Control. Because, hey, you can!

Philosophy - Efficient Creatures (Rhox, Doran, Rafiq, KotR) backed by anti-anti-creature spells &amp; drawing engines (eg. negate, guttural).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between Ancient Ziggurat &amp; Reflecting Pool, it&#8217;s time to come out with the 5CCC Deck &#8211; Five Colour Creature Control. Because, hey, you can!</p>
<p>Philosophy &#8211; Efficient Creatures (Rhox, Doran, Rafiq, KotR) backed by anti-anti-creature spells &amp; drawing engines (eg. negate, guttural).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GRat</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2009/01/conflux-knight-of-the-reliquary/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>GRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=385#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Cute!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

