<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughtseize v. Rampant Growth &#8211; Fight!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivewithflores.com/2008/11/thoughtseize-v-rampant-growth-fight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2008/11/thoughtseize-v-rampant-growth-fight/</link>
	<description>Where you learn to love what Mike Flores loves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 04:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five With Flores &#187; You Make the Play, You Make the Play</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2008/11/thoughtseize-v-rampant-growth-fight/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Five With Flores &#187; You Make the Play, You Make the Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=115#comment-201</guid>
		<description>[...] on this site!), I wanted to tie up some older installments of You Make the Play. First, regarding Thoughtseize v. Rampant Growth - Fight! (itself a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on this site!), I wanted to tie up some older installments of You Make the Play. First, regarding Thoughtseize v. Rampant Growth &#8211; Fight! (itself a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starwarer</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2008/11/thoughtseize-v-rampant-growth-fight/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>starwarer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=115#comment-92</guid>
		<description>This one sentence by Mike:
 &quot;However, given how much the Jund Mana Ramp side favors the Civic Wayfinder over the Gift of the Gargantuan&quot;

caught me off guard.  I am unfamiliar with how the deck wants to play.  While I am pretty good with the abstract, I have had woefully little practical experience with Standard (and Constructed in general).

With this little tidbit of information, and the fact that anything gained through the Gift will be known (Faeries is remarkably capable of playing around a Cloudthresher, especially if its known to be there), there is a much larger impetus for choosing the creature.

Still, my decision in-game would largely be determined by what cards I have in hand (as the Faeries player), as that would tell me what I can and can&#039;t deal with.  (For instance, do I have removal or countermagic, and what type).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one sentence by Mike:<br />
 &#8220;However, given how much the Jund Mana Ramp side favors the Civic Wayfinder over the Gift of the Gargantuan&#8221;</p>
<p>caught me off guard.  I am unfamiliar with how the deck wants to play.  While I am pretty good with the abstract, I have had woefully little practical experience with Standard (and Constructed in general).</p>
<p>With this little tidbit of information, and the fact that anything gained through the Gift will be known (Faeries is remarkably capable of playing around a Cloudthresher, especially if its known to be there), there is a much larger impetus for choosing the creature.</p>
<p>Still, my decision in-game would largely be determined by what cards I have in hand (as the Faeries player), as that would tell me what I can and can&#8217;t deal with.  (For instance, do I have removal or countermagic, and what type).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://fivewithflores.com/2008/11/thoughtseize-v-rampant-growth-fight/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivewithflores.com/?p=115#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I stand by what i said earlier, the wayfinder being correct.

The part about autopilot is really interesting and I think it accounts for much more losses than players give it credit for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand by what i said earlier, the wayfinder being correct.</p>
<p>The part about autopilot is really interesting and I think it accounts for much more losses than players give it credit for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

